HealthBlawg

David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog

    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Email
  • About
  • Archives
  • Podcast
  • Press
  • Awards/Reviews
  • HIPAA
  • HCSM

GAO says Medicare Advantage plans save seniors money … or cost seniors (and taxpayers) too much money … or something …

February 28, 2008

The great thing about reading a study, or a report about a study, showing … well, just for example, that EHRs don’t save any money, or that drinking alcohol is good for you, is that, gosh darn it, there’s always another study that shows the exact opposite.

Since we’re so pressed for time these days, two of the great interpreters of studies on the costs of managed care plans — AHIP (that’s America’s Health Insurance Plans) and the AFL-CIO — have collaborated in cutting down the cycle time for this phenomenon.  Today they issued complementary statements regarding a single report: one entitled GAO Confirms That Medicare Advantage Yields Savings for Seniors; the other, GAO: Private Medicare Plans a Bad Deal for Seniors.  Can you guess which is which?

Truth is, the newspaper formerly known as the gray lady seemed just as befuddled: the report is cited for the proposition that private Medicare plans often cost beneficiaries more than traditional Medicare, but the article devolves into a whole lot of he said, she said.

So what does the GAO report on Medicare Advantage actually say or mean?  (The title is an equivocal "Medicare Advantage: Increased Spending Relative to Medicare Fee-for-Service May Not Always Reduce Beneficiary Out-of-Pocket Costs."  Hmm.)

For one thing, it says that rebates paid by CMS to Medicare Advantage ("MA") plans exceed the plans’ cost savings over traditional Medicare.  More specifically, the GAO’s own summary says:

Whether the value that MA beneficiaries receive in the form of reduced cost sharing, lower premiums, and additional benefits is worth the additional cost [i.e., the rebates] is a decision for policymakers. However, if the policy objective is to subsidize health care costs of low-income Medicare beneficiaries, it may be more efficient to directly target subsidies to a defined low-income population than to subsidize premiums and cost sharing for all MA beneficiaries, including those who are well off. As Congress considers the design and cost of MA, it will be important for policymakers to balance the needs of beneficiaries and the necessity of addressing Medicare’s long-term financial health.

In commenting on a draft of this report, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services expressed concern that the report was not balanced because it did not sufficiently focus on the advantages of MA plans. GAO disagrees. This report provides information on how plans projected they would use rebates and identified instances in which MA beneficiaries could have out-of-pocket costs higher than they would have experienced under Medicare FFS.

So there may be additional money spent by and/or on behalf of patients enrolled in MA plans, but that’s because they get services above and beyond the traditional Medicare package, right?  Well, that’s part of the story.  The other part is that some of the less-savory marketing tactics used in connection with some of these plans resulted in folks enrolling in plans with networks that didn’t include their regular providers (read: big out-of-pocket expense).

The bottom line is that it’s less black-and-white than advocates on either side of the issue would have you believe, and that if there’s blame to be laid at anyone’s feet, it’s to be laid at the feet of a variety of parties, including both the regulators (or, in this case, Congress) and the regulated community.

— David Harlow

Filed Under: CMS, Consumer-Directed Health, Health care policy, Health Law, Managed Care, Medicare

you might also like:

  1. Is CMS overselling (and overpaying) Medicare Advantage plans?

  2. Future Outlook: Medicare Advantage Plans & Risk Adjustment

  3. Narrow Networks and Medicare Advantage: The True Meaning of Managed Care?

« Grand Rounds is up at ScienceRoll
Blawg Review #149 is up at Antitrust Review »

Comments

  1. Dan says

    March 9, 2008 at 10:20 pm

    In regards to medicare and it’s prescription ‘benefit’,that was constructed with deliberate design to protect the interests of the pharma industry in particular, with the donut hole and inablilit to negotiate prices. Why can prices be negotiated with other large government health entities, such as the VA (champus), and not medicare? Also, what’s up with the donut hole. That seems to have been mathematically determined, certainly not for the benefit of assuring health for our elderly.

    There seems to be a pathologcally intimate relationship that exists with the administration and big business associated with the health care system. And I view this as discouraging and potentially damaging to my fellow citizens, who may lack awareness of this strategy I speculate. Changes should be made for the benefit of others.

Trackbacks

  1. InsureBlog says:
    March 6, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    Health Wonk Review is up!

    I decided a while back not to sell Medicare D plans, but I’ve kept my hands in the “regular” MedSupp marketplace. Over at the Health Care Law Blog, David Harlow takes a behind-the-scenes look at Medicare Advantage plans.

Follow me on Twitter

David Harlow πŸ’‰πŸ˜· Follow 43,200 17,541

Mastodon @healthblawg@c.im #HealthCare #MedDevice #Compliance #Privacy @MyOmnipod #HIPAA #digitalhealth #HarlowOnHC #pinksocks Tweets are tweets No more no less

healthblawg
healthblawg avatar; David Harlow πŸ’‰πŸ˜· @healthblawg ·
1h 1638640040317440001

The Harlow #Healthcare #Innovation Daily #digitalhealth #hcldr #HarlowOnHC Thanks to @DigitalSalutem #digitalhealth #healthtech

Image for twitter card

Eight steps to a successful AI implementation

information-age.com OpenText outline in Information Age the eight key implementation steps to help AI and machine lear...

paper.li

Reply on Twitter 1638640040317440001 Retweet on Twitter 1638640040317440001 0 Like on Twitter 1638640040317440001 0 Twitter 1638640040317440001
Retweet on Twitter David Harlow πŸ’‰πŸ˜· Retweeted
HCNowRadio avatar; HealthcareNOWradio @HCNowRadio ·
10h 1638517571107401733

NEXT at 8:30 am ET @healthblawg speaks with Steven Lane, PCP, informaticist and CMO @HealthGorilla, who has much to say about #healthdata, data on #SDoH, the power of data to improve healthcare and more. #HarlowOnHC #QHINs https://healthcarenowradio.airtime.pro/

Image for the Tweet beginning: NEXT at 8:30 am ET Twitter feed image.
Reply on Twitter 1638517571107401733 Retweet on Twitter 1638517571107401733 3 Like on Twitter 1638517571107401733 1 Twitter 1638517571107401733
healthblawg avatar; David Harlow πŸ’‰πŸ˜· @healthblawg ·
5h 1638583863076167706

ICYMI> Lissy Hu, President of Connected Networks at WellSky β€” Harlow on Healthcare https://healthblawg.com/2023/01/lissy-hu-wellsky.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ReviveOldPost #digitalhealth #hcldr #hitsm

Image for the Tweet beginning: ICYMI>  Lissy Hu, President Twitter feed image.
Reply on Twitter 1638583863076167706 Retweet on Twitter 1638583863076167706 0 Like on Twitter 1638583863076167706 0 Twitter 1638583863076167706
Load More
Follow me on Mastodon

HIPAAtools

Hipaatools

The HIPAA Compliance Toolkit

The Walking Gallery

The Walking Gallery

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Categories
  • Archives
  • Podcast Interviews
  • HIPAAtools
  • HIPAA Compliance
  • Health Care Social Media
  • Speaking
  • In the Press
  • Blogroll

David Harlow

David Harlow

HealthcareNOW Radio

Connect with David

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Email
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Book Me: Speaking
  • About
  • The Harlow Group LLC
Copyright © 2006–2023
HealthBlawg is a publication of The Harlow Group LLC. See Copyright notice and disclaimer.
Fair use with attribution and a link is encouraged. Click for more on David Harlow.
[footer_backtotop text="Back to top" href="#"]