HealthBlawg

David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog

    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Email
  • About
  • Archives
  • Podcast
  • Press
  • Awards/Reviews
  • HIPAA
  • HCSM

Health IT: Is it worthwhile, and will the government screw up a good thing?

June 12, 2008

Item:  CBO says EHRs don't really save money after all.

Item:  DoD is hard at work undermining VistA (developed over years at taxpayer expense and now in the public domain) and replacing it with a zillion-dollar military-industrial complex "solution."

Item:  ONCHIT's two-years-overdue report on the development of a National Health Information Network and expansion of EHR use comes out and seems to come from another planet.

All in all, the federales seem hell-bent on screwing up what could be a good thing — or are they?

The headlines on the CBO report ignore the full story:  EHR adoption alone won't help — adoption needs to be followed by changes in practice.  For a good (but long) review of the CBO report and other prognostications on the future and value of EHRs, see Mark Frise's Policy Blog.  Score one for the bureaucrats.

Health Beat is beating the drum on DoD's undermining of VistA, and the approach described there seems to be of a piece with the ONC's report, which continues to recommend pushing development into the private sector, and — as pointed out in a scathing review on The Health Care Blog, seems blissfully unaware of the existence of the Internet, and its use for secure transmission of health information.  While I am not technologically savvy enough to appreciate the potential shortcomings of VistA, a bunch of techies are lined up behind it, and it has encouraged a fair number of businesses to sprout up based on tweaking and implementing it in various settings.  The ONC report just seems to confirm folks' worst fears about government –  too big, unwieldy and out-of-touch to do much good.  It is a striking contrast to the VA that nurtured the development of ViistA and that has managed to eke significant improvements and cost savings out of its vast system, thanks in part to VistA. 

Bottom line: EHR systems have potential to do good, but they need to be implemented in a sensible, cost-effective and interoperable manner, and clinicians need to make the best use possible of the intelligence that they can help us gather and process. 

Sounds obvious, right?  So why isn't this just happening? 

One issue is, of course, the cost of implementation.  The feds have taken a variety of baby steps in the right direction (e.g., the recent EHR demonstration project grants), and some pending legislation might go further (see links to legislation in a previous HealthBlawg post), but EHR adoption is held up by the initial cost (equipment, software, training, lost productivity while learning the system) to smaller providers and provider networks across the country. 

Another is the resistance by many seasoned clinicians to change their practice patterns, even in the face of evidence.  Pay for performance incentives may assist in moving these behaviors around, but payors in the U.S. seem stuck at a ceiling of about 5% of total compensation being tied to performance.  (Maybe it's the fear of paying to get someone healthier and then have that patient switch insurers next open enrollment, thereby losing the benefit of that investment).

There are other reasons, too, I'm sure . . . . I've gotten a little off the mark here and perhaps dangerously close to arguing for a single payor system (which I hadn't meant to do), and this issue is closely connected to a host of others, so I'll just stop here for today.

— David Harlow   
 

Filed Under: CMS, E-Prescribing, Ehealth, EHR, Health care policy, Health Law, HIT, Hospitals, Medicare, Pay for performance, Physicians

you might also like:

  1. Interoperable EHRs: elusive grail or within our grasp?

  2. Open source EHR? VistA Lite goes for CCHIT certification with a wiki-based support model. Hmm.

  3. Patient compliance with prescription regimens, evil for-profit health care companies, and Health 2.0

« MS 1.20: Has the Joint Commission come to its senses on medical staff bylaws?
Washington week wrap-up for health wonks »

Comments

  1. Tim says

    June 13, 2008 at 10:29 am

    “There are other reasons, too, I’m sure . . . . I’ve gotten a little off the mark here and perhaps dangerously close to arguing for a single payor system (which I hadn’t meant to do), and this issue is closely connected to a host of others, so I’ll just stop here for today.”

    This is likely the beginning point of a great blog entry. 😉 Keep the thought going. It is being proven everywhere else in the world.

  2. David Harlow says

    June 25, 2008 at 9:49 am

    I commented yesterday on the chronic care discussion going on at http://newtalk.org , and found myself arguing in favor of single payor again . . . . Check it out at http://newtalk.org/2008/06/chronic-care-do-we-need-an-ent.php

Follow me on Twitter

David Harlow 💉😷 Follow 43,200 17,542

Mastodon @healthblawg@c.im #HealthCare #MedDevice #Compliance #Privacy @MyOmnipod #HIPAA #digitalhealth #HarlowOnHC #pinksocks Tweets are tweets No more no less

healthblawg
healthblawg avatar; David Harlow 💉😷 @healthblawg ·
3h 1638640040317440001

The Harlow #Healthcare #Innovation Daily #digitalhealth #hcldr #HarlowOnHC Thanks to @DigitalSalutem #digitalhealth #healthtech

Image for twitter card

Eight steps to a successful AI implementation

information-age.com OpenText outline in Information Age the eight key implementation steps to help AI and machine lear...

paper.li

Reply on Twitter 1638640040317440001 Retweet on Twitter 1638640040317440001 0 Like on Twitter 1638640040317440001 0 Twitter 1638640040317440001
Retweet on Twitter David Harlow 💉😷 Retweeted
HCNowRadio avatar; HealthcareNOWradio @HCNowRadio ·
11h 1638517571107401733

NEXT at 8:30 am ET @healthblawg speaks with Steven Lane, PCP, informaticist and CMO @HealthGorilla, who has much to say about #healthdata, data on #SDoH, the power of data to improve healthcare and more. #HarlowOnHC #QHINs https://healthcarenowradio.airtime.pro/

Image for the Tweet beginning: NEXT at 8:30 am ET Twitter feed image.
Reply on Twitter 1638517571107401733 Retweet on Twitter 1638517571107401733 3 Like on Twitter 1638517571107401733 1 Twitter 1638517571107401733
healthblawg avatar; David Harlow 💉😷 @healthblawg ·
7h 1638583863076167706

ICYMI> Lissy Hu, President of Connected Networks at WellSky — Harlow on Healthcare https://healthblawg.com/2023/01/lissy-hu-wellsky.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ReviveOldPost #digitalhealth #hcldr #hitsm

Image for the Tweet beginning: ICYMI>  Lissy Hu, President Twitter feed image.
Reply on Twitter 1638583863076167706 Retweet on Twitter 1638583863076167706 0 Like on Twitter 1638583863076167706 0 Twitter 1638583863076167706
Load More
Follow me on Mastodon

HIPAAtools

Hipaatools

The HIPAA Compliance Toolkit

The Walking Gallery

The Walking Gallery

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Categories
  • Archives
  • Podcast Interviews
  • HIPAAtools
  • HIPAA Compliance
  • Health Care Social Media
  • Speaking
  • In the Press
  • Blogroll

David Harlow

David Harlow

HealthcareNOW Radio

Connect with David

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Email
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Book Me: Speaking
  • About
  • The Harlow Group LLC
Copyright © 2006–2023
HealthBlawg is a publication of The Harlow Group LLC. See Copyright notice and disclaimer.
Fair use with attribution and a link is encouraged. Click for more on David Harlow.
[footer_backtotop text="Back to top" href="#"]