HealthBlawg

David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog

  • About
  • Archives
  • Podcast
  • Press
  • Awards/Reviews
  • HIPAA
  • HCSM

OIG advisory opinion OK's certain ambulance service support for county expenses

October 22, 2007

Last week, the OIG posted an October 12 advisory opinion regarding private ambulance service support for county expenses incurred in connection with prehospital care and transportation provided under exclusive contracts with the ambulance services providing the support.

Most municipalities no longer ask for — and most ambulance services no longer offer — vehicle donations and other goodies in return for exclusive contracts.  This advisory opinion serves to remind us that while freebies not closely related to the contract in question are a no-no, some closely-related financial supports are, in fact, permitted.

In this case, partial reimbursement for administrative and dispatch expenses, and free care for uninsured — all related to the county inmates whose transport was the subject of the contract (and which was billed to third parties) — were found by the OIG to be permissible.

The grounds for this decision were as follows:

  • The arrangement was part of a comprehensive municipal program to secure transport services
  • Payments for administrative and dispatch expenses will not cover their full cost
  • Even though payments will vary with volume, the payment will not induce referrals, as most volume is 911 volume
  • The arrangement in this case is with providers that have been contracting with the county  government for over 25 years
  • The remuneration in this case would inure to the public benefit
  • The arrangement was developed by the county government
  • "Importantly, there is no ancillary or unrelated remuneration offered or paid by the Ambulance Services to the County . . . .  We might have reached a different result if the Ambulance Services had offered the County . . .  some remuneration not directly related to the provision of the emergency medical transports covered by the contracts including, by way of example, free or reduced cost equipment for . . . County agencies."

Expect a proliferation of carefully-constructed support programs in the wake of this advisory.

— David Harlow

Related Posts

  • David Harlow quoted on OIG Advisory Opinions in Part B Insider

    I spoke last week with Torrey Kim, editor of Eli's Part B Insider, to offer…

  • New OIG advisory blesses municipal ambulance service "insurance only" billing for residents

    OIG Advisory Opinion 06-07, posted June 29, confirms earlier advisories and, interestingly, relies on a…

  • OIG advisory dings existing and proposed home oxygen arrangements of DME supplier

    The OIG issued a negative advisory opinion earlier this month. A DME supplier requested confirmation…

Filed Under: Emergency Medical Services, Fraud and Abuse, Health care policy, Health Law, OIG

« Blawg Review is up
HealthVault: The end of the world as we know it? »

Comments

  1. Ambulance Doctor says

    December 13, 2007 at 12:53 pm

    Absolutely right solution. I agree with every point.

    http://www.air-lifeline.com

Threads

Follow me on: Threads

Mastodon

Follow me on: Mastodon

HIPAAtools

Hipaatools

The HIPAA Compliance Toolkit

The Walking Gallery

The Walking Gallery

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Categories
  • Archives
  • Podcast Interviews
  • HIPAAtools
  • HIPAA Compliance
  • Health Care Social Media
  • Speaking
  • In the Press
  • Blogroll

David Harlow

David Harlow

HealthcareNOW Radio

  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Book Me: Speaking
  • About
  • The Harlow Group LLC
Copyright © 2006–2025
HealthBlawg is a publication of The Harlow Group LLC. See Copyright notice and disclaimer.
Fair use with attribution and a link is encouraged. Click for more on David Harlow.
[footer_backtotop text="Back to top" href="#"]