The beat goes on -- Maggie Mahar's pulled together a diverse group of posts for…
In the weeks leading up to the HIMSS 2018 conference in early March, I posted a question to the HIMSS community (45,000 strong in person at the conference and over 180,000 strong on the Linked In group), seeking to encourage conversation about the intersection of value-based care and population health.
Here’s the post (check it out in its original form on Linked In to see all the comments — you’ll have to join the group if you aren’t already a member):
Implicit in that question are many other questions: What is it, exactly, that we are measuring? How do we know if a particular change is an improvement? How much of an improvement is enough? What are the incentives that are sufficient to move the various actors on the healthcare stage?
I think it is fair to say that the “science” of population health management should be considered to be under development. There are always further improvements that may be made.
A recurring conversation that I have been engaged in over the years revolves around the question of measures: What are we measuring? What are we incentivizing? Are we really buying better health through this approach to value-based payment for healthcare services?
We are certainly hurtling along the value-based care trajectory, and may not have the opportunity to make more that just a few mid-course corrections.
However, as we think about what future state we are trying to reach with these incentives, it is useful to think about health on a population level – not looking solely at patient-level or panel-level measures over time.
I heard a nice definition of population health recently: “Connecting people with resources for healthy living.”
That really spoke to me, because it represents a step back from a tightly-quantified measure to a broader approach to social determinants of health (SDOH). There is a growing understanding that SDOH are foundational to patient and population health; that without taking care of the basics – food, shelter, clothing – delivering health care services is simply not enough.
With this background I ask you: What is your definition of population health and what are the tools we need to manage it more effectively?
David Harlow
The Harlow Group LLC
Health Care Law and Consulting
Healthcare NOW Radio Podcast Network · Harlow on Healthcare
In this episode I speak with Ryne Natzke, Chief Revenue Officer of TrustCommerce, a Sphere…
Natalie Davis, CEO of United States of Care, returned to Harlow on Healthcare to discuss…
If the EHR is the system of record, then Lumeon is the system of action.…
Blockchain in healthcare? Well, it can solve some problems. Have a listen to my conversation…
Joel Diamond, Chief Medical Officer at 2bPrecise, speaks with me about bringing genetic testing information…