I spoke at this week's HIMSS Privacy and Security Forum in Boston on the privacy…
Welcome to the latest edition of the HealthCare SocialMedia Review, the blog carnival that's all about health care social media. Today we take a look at some of the privacy and security issues relevant to the medium, and at some other current and topical posts from around the blogosphere. But first, pour yourself another cup of coffee, put your feet up, and have a listen to a lighthearted ode to an emblem of secrecy from an earlier age:
Tell some folks you have a secret, and they'll be all over you, cajoling it out of you.
When my late grandmother was an irrepressible little old lady in her late 90's, she would chat people up wherever she met them, and folks would invariably ask her how old she was. She would smile and respond: "Can you keep a secret?" As her next victim leaned in, nodding his or her head, she'd let loose the zinger: "So can I."
Responsible users of health care social media understand that a juicy anecdote can make a point far more effectively than a dry textbook recitation of facts and figures, but we also appreciate the need to make sure, sometimes, that "the names have been changed to protect the innocent," the need to keep some things secret. This imperative exists in a relationship of dynamic tension with the need to share information in order to promote better understanding of disease and health at both the individual and population level. Neither is an absolute; both need to be observed, and each has its exceptions. Welcome to the exciting world of health care social media!
Last week marked the first edition of the TEDMED conference in its new home, and one of the TEDMED talks highlighted this tension by essentially posing the question: Would you join the Facebook of medicine? Leslie Saxon wants to "get 8 billion heartbeats on speed dial" via everyheartbeat.org, bringing the Quantified Self movement to everyone, and her message was heard loud and clear across the pond by 3G Doctor, who blogged about her talk.
Phil Baumann finds the prospect to be creepy.
Mark Browne has another take on the QS approach, and the way in which patients may need to be engaged in their health care, inspired by a Google Street View car sighting. (Let's assume the Google Street View car isn't listening in on patient data transmissions, though.)
It's nice to see a new generation grappling with the issues raised by the use of social media in medicine. Medical student Emily Lu has a post up at KevinMD.com on the ethics of social media use in medicine – she offers more questions than answers, but the questions are key ones that demand our attention. As we work towards answering these questions for a new generation, an older generation (not that old), in the person of Bryan Vartabedian, says that when it comes to doctors and social media, the sky is not about to fall anytime soon.
Physicians and patients are often the focus of discussions about health care social media, but other health care professionals are, of course, using these tools as well. Barbara Ficarra highlights their use by nurses, and calls attention to a nursing tweetchat (#APRNchat … not to be confused with #RNchat).
For anyone considering dipping a toe in the health care social media waters, a top-of-mind question is always: Is it worth the time and effort? At Walking the Path, Fard Johnmar suggests that ROI isn't the right metric, and that there are other ways to measure the full economic benefits of digital health content.
Pharma has a continuing love-hate relationship with social media, and last week, Boehringer US posted social media guidance for employees — on YouTube. Kinda cheesy feel to it, IMHO, but it distills it all down to four points: (1) You are responsible for your behavior, (2) Understand the tools, (3) Think about your audience and (4) You are our eyes, ears, and voice.
(You might also want to check out this old chestnut, from Dan Hinmon of Hive Strategies and your humble HealthBlawger: 9 No-Nonsense Rules to Ensure a HIPAA-Compliant Social Media Strategy.)
Responding in part to the FDA's issuance of incredibly limited social media guidelines, Laurie Gelb offers some thoughts on a way forward for pharma and social media on The Health Care Blog.
While we're on the subject of social media guidelines, be sure to check out the HIMSS social media workgroup white paper posted on the HIMSS blog with a call for comments and a nod to Lee Aase, Director of the MCCSM.
Aside from the do's and don'ts, U.S. health care organizations need more work in the whys and wherefores department. A recent study shows that in the US of A, health care organizations use social media mostly for marketing, unlike their counterparts in a number of other countries, where use is more focused on communication — among providers or otherwise. (Of course, our market-based health care economy may have just a little bit to do with that focus, no?)
Speaking of the market … "Free" is never really free, and we pay for some online tools by exposing ourselves to ads. Context-sensitive ads based on health content are cause for concern over at David Williams' Health Business Blog. This brings to mind the new Google privacy policy, which says the 'plex has a hands-off policy when it comes to "sensitive personal information," including "confidential medical facts" (gosh, did a lawyer write this policy?) — but we've seen this movie too, in an earlier NY Times piece about Target and, well, targeting.
David Harlow
The Harlow Group LLC
Health Care Law and Consulting
Healthcare NOW Radio Podcast Network · Harlow on Healthcare
In this episode I speak with Ryne Natzke, Chief Revenue Officer of TrustCommerce, a Sphere…
Natalie Davis, CEO of United States of Care, returned to Harlow on Healthcare to discuss…
If the EHR is the system of record, then Lumeon is the system of action.…
Blockchain in healthcare? Well, it can solve some problems. Have a listen to my conversation…
Joel Diamond, Chief Medical Officer at 2bPrecise, speaks with me about bringing genetic testing information…