HealthBlawg

David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog

  • About
  • Archives
  • Podcast
  • Press
  • Awards/Reviews
  • HIPAA
  • HCSM

The conversation on health care cost containment in Massachusetts

January 8, 2008

Nancy Turnbull’s New Year’s Eve post at WBUR’s CommonHealth identified growth rate targets for low-cost health insurance plans that have been put out there by the Massachusetts agencies responsible for health care reform, and looked at a recent three-year period’s experience in the growth of local insurers’ medical expenses and administrative expenses.  The premium growth rate targets have been pegged by different groups at 5%, 7% and nominal GDP growth (i.e., GDP growth, not adjusted for inflation).  And, guess what, growth in expenses has outstripped all of these measures.

Her piece unleashed a torrent of commentary from the payors (including comments from two CEOs, a CFO and the local health plan association chief) pointing out that (a) administrative cost increases of nearly 50% over three years were due in part to accounting rule changes at the Massachusetts Division of Insurance and (b) administrative costs account for only about 10% of total costs, so we’d better focus on controlling medical costs.  Check out the comments on the post linked to above, and also posts here and here at Health Care For All’s A Healthy Blog.

While the dialogue may not result directly in reduction of any category of expense, it is yet another step — and I must say, a refreshingly public step — towards addressing this issue in a transparent manner.  Score one for the blogosphere.

Update 1/8/08:  CMS released its analysis of 2006 National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) data today.  The short version:

U.S. health care spending growth accelerated slightly in 2006, increasing 6.7 percent compared to 6.5 percent in 2005. Total health expenditures reached $2.1 trillion, which translates to $7,026 per person or 16 percent of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product. The health spending share of GDP remained relatively stable in 2006, up by only 0.1 percentage point from 2005.

Not necessarily apples-to-apples, but it’s worth noting that the medical expense growth in Massachusetts is about 10% per year.

— David Harlow


Related Posts

  • Massachusetts universal health care coverage: employer perspective

    I presented an introduction to the MA universal health care law a few weeks ago…

  • Massachusetts Health Care Quality and Cost Council: Quality and cost transparency or veils?

    One of the much-ballyhooed (and predictably delayed and diluted) innovations of the 2006 Massachusetts health…

  • Affordability standards adopted under Massachusetts universal health care law

    The Connector has adopted affordability standards which will lead to health care insurance coverage for…

Filed Under: Health care policy, Health Law, Managed Care, Massachusetts, Universal Health Care

« Grand Rounds is up
Minute Clinic regs approved in Massachusetts »

Threads

Follow me on: Threads

Mastodon

Follow me on: Mastodon

HIPAAtools

Hipaatools

The HIPAA Compliance Toolkit

The Walking Gallery

The Walking Gallery

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Categories
  • Archives
  • Podcast Interviews
  • HIPAAtools
  • HIPAA Compliance
  • Health Care Social Media
  • Speaking
  • In the Press
  • Blogroll

David Harlow

David Harlow

HealthcareNOW Radio

  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Book Me: Speaking
  • About
  • The Harlow Group LLC
Copyright © 2006–2025
HealthBlawg is a publication of The Harlow Group LLC. See Copyright notice and disclaimer.
Fair use with attribution and a link is encouraged. Click for more on David Harlow.
[footer_backtotop text="Back to top" href="#"]