HealthBlawg

David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog

    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Email
  • About
  • Archives
  • Podcast
  • Press
  • Awards/Reviews
  • HIPAA
  • HCSM

IOM recommends P4P for Medicare

September 24, 2006

The proverbial 800-pound gorilla of health care seems poised to jump on the pay-for-performance (P4P) bandwagon.

Last week, the Institute of Medicine released a report recommending that Medicare start moving in that direction — though in a measured, gradual way, acknowledging that there’s still precious little data on P4P programs, no truly standardized metrics, and a need to support providers with the IT infrastructure necessary to measure and report performance.  The press release noted:

"Medicare beneficiaries are not getting the highest possible quality of care because the program’s payment system encourages volume rather than efficiency and quality," said committee chair Steven A. Schroeder, Distinguished Professor of Health and Health Care, University of California, San Francisco.  "The urgency of the situation demands that steps be taken now to encourage health care institutions and clinicians to improve their quality.  Pay for performance has demonstrated sufficient promise based on early experience that it should be pursued, albeit cautiously and in a manner that allows for learning and adjustment as needed. And we should remember that pay for performance is just one part of the solution; other interventions will be needed to achieve the level of quality that Medicare patients deserve."

The IOM panel recommends implementing this approach with no new dollars, which means base compensation for providers would be reduced.  This yielded the expected calls for new funding for bonus pools from the American Hospital Association and American Medical Association (see AP/Yahoo story).

The provider lobby is not wrong — providers as a group will see lower base compensation if and when these proposals are implemented.  (. . . And even if they aren’t; coming reductions in Medicare payments to providers have been the subject of several HealthBlawg posts — including those here, here and here.)  What P4P offers, though, is an opportunity for providers to distinguish themselves based on outcomes, compared against a standardized set of measures.

In theory, this approach dovetails nicely with the consumer-directed health policies espoused by the current administration, and holds out a glimmer of hope that not only may providers be held more accountable for patient outcomes (measured over a large population of cases), but provider selections by consumers may be made on the basis of meaningful, consumer-friendly data — and not on the basis of provider likeability or other factors unrelated to quality of care (see recent RAND study).

While neither providers nor patients like serving as test subjects for investigators trying to prove a theory like this, P4P programs focused on paying for outcomes rather than process are the wave of the future, and providers would be well advised to continue developing the means to provide and measure what payors are prepared to pay for.  

Filed Under: CMS, Consumer-Directed Health, Health Law, Hospitals, Managed Care, Medicare, Pay for performance, Physicians

you might also like:

  1. P4P spreading like wildfire

  2. More hospital industry perspective on Medicare value-based purchasing (P4P)

  3. CMS pilots P4P in Medicare population with chronic conditions

« Free money for emergency care provided to undocumented aliens? Many providers say no thanks
CMS puts out second, parallel, gainsharing RFP »

Follow me on Twitter

David Harlow 💉😷 Follow 42,910 17,570

Mastodon @healthblawg@c.im #HealthCare #MedDevice #Compliance #Privacy @MyOmnipod #HIPAA #digitalhealth #HarlowOnHC #pinksocks Tweets are tweets No more no less

healthblawg
healthblawg avatar; David Harlow 💉😷 @healthblawg ·
5h 1620535759902998528

The Harlow #Healthcare #Innovation Daily #digitalhealth #hcldr #HarlowOnHC #digitalhealth #healthtech

Image for twitter card

Google Research and DeepMind develop AI medical chatbot

digitalhealth.net A new AI-powered medical-specific chatbot developed by Google and DeepMind has shown some potential for clinical applications.

paper.li

Reply on Twitter 1620535759902998528 Retweet on Twitter 1620535759902998528 0 Like on Twitter 1620535759902998528 0 Twitter 1620535759902998528
healthblawg avatar; David Harlow 💉😷 @healthblawg ·
6h 1620524933863378944

ICYMI> Paul Schrimpf, at Prophet Consulting, Driving Health Care Transformation — Harlow on Healthcare https://healthblawg.com/2022/12/paul-schrimpf-prophet-consulting.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ReviveOldPost #digitalhealth #hcldr #hitsm

Image for the Tweet beginning: ICYMI>  Paul Schrimpf, at Twitter feed image.
Reply on Twitter 1620524933863378944 Retweet on Twitter 1620524933863378944 0 Like on Twitter 1620524933863378944 0 Twitter 1620524933863378944
healthblawg avatar; David Harlow 💉😷 @healthblawg ·
11h 1620445622955278337

Moonshots — StartUp Health https://paper.li/healthblawg/1369855999?read=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.startuphealth.com%2Fmoonshots #hcldr

Reply on Twitter 1620445622955278337 Retweet on Twitter 1620445622955278337 0 Like on Twitter 1620445622955278337 0 Twitter 1620445622955278337
Load More
Follow me on Mastodon

HIPAAtools

Hipaatools

The HIPAA Compliance Toolkit

The Walking Gallery

The Walking Gallery

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Categories
  • Archives
  • Podcast Interviews
  • HIPAAtools
  • HIPAA Compliance
  • Health Care Social Media
  • Speaking
  • In the Press
  • Blogroll

David Harlow

David Harlow

HealthcareNOW Radio

Connect with David

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Email
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Book Me: Speaking
  • About
  • The Harlow Group LLC
Copyright © 2006–2023
HealthBlawg is a publication of The Harlow Group LLC. See Copyright notice and disclaimer.
Fair use with attribution and a link is encouraged. Click for more on David Harlow.
[footer_backtotop text="Back to top" href="#"]